Comparison
LoreOwl vs Trello
Tickets that live next to your commits, builds and playtest reports.
- $5
- Trello Standard, per user a month
- $10
- Trello Premium, per user a month
- Included
- Issues in every LoreOwl plan
Billed yearly. $6 billed monthly.
Billed yearly. $12.50 monthly. The plan with the timeline view.
Board and timeline, with no separate bill or invite list.
| Aspect | Trello | LoreOwl |
|---|---|---|
| Board | Yes | Yes |
| Timeline | Premium and up | Every plan |
| Assignees | Yes | No |
| Labels, checklists and custom fields | Yes | No |
| Comments | Threads | One comment field |
| Attachments | Yes | No |
| Automation | Yes | No |
| Mobile app | Yes | No |
| Next to your commits and builds | No | Yes |
| Live updates | Yes | Yes |
Where Trello is the better fit
- You need assignees, labels, checklists or attachments
- You rely on automation
- People work from their phones
- The board is shared with people outside the project
What LoreOwl does not do
- No assignees.
- No labels, checklists or custom fields.
- No attachments.
- One comment field per ticket, not a thread.
- Desktop app only, and it is Windows only today.
Trello facts on this page come from its own site, checked in October 2026: pricing. They change, so check them before you decide.
The other comparisons
Replace GitHubLarge binary files versioned without Git LFS, with builds, a vault and issues in the same app.Replace PerforceFile locking and large files, without a server to run or a typemap to maintain.Replace AnchorpointHosted Lore with storage included, plus builds, a vault and issues, instead of a client for a host you run.Replace JenkinsGame builds, checks and store uploads built in, with no server or Jenkinsfile to maintain.